Coordination, not an organization.
Oklahoma's governing Republicans keep losing primaries they should win — not for lack of candidates or conviction, but for lack of coordination. The people who actually elect governing conservatives in this state have never simply compared notes and pointed the same direction. This is that, and nothing heavier.
What it is
A handful of the professionals who elect governing Republicans, talking more and working from the same intelligence, aimed at the races that decide the direction of the state.
What it is not
Not an entity. No board, no dues, no membership card, no public launch. Nothing to sign and nothing to announce. It works precisely because it never becomes a thing anyone can point at.
The one commitment
We don't run against each other's candidates in the races that matter. Everything else — shared data, shared read of the board, shared bench — is easy. That single norm is the whole ask.
Why now
2026 made the stakes plain, and 2028 concentrates them onto a single ballot. The window to get organized is the next eighteen months, quietly.
Everything converges on one primary.
In June 2028 every surviving Freedom Caucus senator stands for re-election on the same ballot. The Speakership comes open the same cycle. One primary decides the members, both chambers' leadership, and the ground the 2030 governor's race is fought on.
And the fight is smaller than its reputation. These are primaries of a few thousand votes, decided by whether anyone bothers to recruit and coordinate against an incumbent:
| Seat | Region | What the record shows |
|---|---|---|
| SD15 | Norman metro | Held by 56 votes in the 2024 runoff — a six-way primary the incumbent led with 34%. |
| SD5 | Southeast | The incumbent's only contested win was a 22-vote 2020 runoff; unopposed since. |
| SD1 | Northeast | 53% in the 2024 primary against a first-time opponent. |
| SD3 | Northeast | The incumbent trailed the 2024 primary, then won the runoff. |
| SD43 | South-central | Unseated a sitting senator outright in 2024. |
| SD21 | North-central | Won 80% in 2024 — safe. |
Public election results, Oklahoma State Election Board. The two most competitive of these seats were last held by a combined margin under 100 votes — the size of a single House race, not a statewide war.
The faction wins uncontested primaries because our side puts nobody up. Two good candidates in one primary is a self-inflicted loss. Coordination fixes exactly that.
The 2026 primaries were a $41.1M outside-money event — and almost none of it was reported.
Independent expenditure against and for candidates in Oklahoma's 2026 races totaled $41,091,922, across 58 spending vehicles. It comes out of a corpus of 457 filings, every one reconciled to the filer's own reported total (457 of 457). Press coverage captured a small fraction of it. This is the board, fully assembled, for the first time.
Who supplied it — the traced money
| Funder | State | Into 2026 OK races |
|---|---|---|
| Defend Us Inc | DC | $5,700,000 |
| Conservative Agenda for America | VA | $3,000,000 |
| Oklahoma Leadership Advocacy Group, Inc. | OK | $2,115,000 |
| America Works Fund | TX | $1,710,000 |
| A Public Voice, Inc. | VA | $1,200,000 |
| Restoration of America PAC | FL | $1,000,000 |
| Strong Policy, Inc. | AL | $980,000 |
| Frontier Victory Action Fund | VA | $350,000 |
The largest single chain, end to end
Jeff Yass of Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania → School Freedom Fund, federal super PAC C00794396 → SFF Buying LLC of Texas → $7,753,418 of television against Gentner Drummond. Yass supplied $15,000,000 of that PAC's $17.9M in 2026 receipts, in two checks — June 2025 and February 2026. Everything else on its schedule is investment income.
Every figure on this page is candidate races only. The full 2026 filed record is $45,631,913; the difference, $4,539,991, is one ballot question — State Question 832, the minimum wage — which belongs to a different fight and is kept out of these numbers. The board tab draws the whole record, that question included.
Funder table: Schedule A of each Oklahoma committee's own filing. The chain above is invisible in Oklahoma filings by design — the federal PAC never wires money to the Oklahoma committee. It pays the vendor directly and books it as a non-federal disbursement on the FEC Schedule B, so the Oklahoma committee has no donor to report. The same federal filing shows $6,000,000 moved the same way into Tennessee. This is a template being run state by state, not an Oklahoma operation, and nothing in the record suggests it will be smaller in 2028.
The lesson of 2026 is not that money is everything — the most heavily outspent statewide candidate still won. It is that no one on the governing side could even see this board. Now someone can.
The whole board, on one map.
Every piece of the $45.6M — committees, funders, the vendors they paid — on the same map as all 145 legislators, every county officer, the statewide and federal delegation, the district attorneys, the courts, the tribal nations and the institutions, each placed where they actually are. Click any node to read it. It is the filed record, assembled.
It reads best full screen: open the board in its own tab ↗. Start with the presets at the lower left. The money v. Drummond traces the single largest chain in the 2026 record from the donor to the screen, and 2028 Senate ballot swaps the map to the seats on the next primary.
The other board: who runs the party.
Everything else on this site is about who wins primaries. This is about who runs the party that holds them, and it is decided on a calendar almost nobody is watching.
Built entirely from the party's published rules, Title 26 and certified 2022 precinct returns. The figures get rebuilt the week after the November general, which sets the 2027 apportionment.
What being part of this means.
Shared sight
The full picture of the money, the seats, and the players — the same intelligence, updated, that assembled the numbers on this site. Nobody else in the state has it.
Deconfliction
One norm, held among the principals: we don't take a client running against a caucus-backed candidate. It rewards whoever recruits. Nothing is signed; it is simply how serious people already prefer to work.
Recruitment
The scarce good is candidates. The coordination exists to find and stand up governing conservatives in the seats that decide the state — starting with the 2028 board.
Discretion
No announcement, no letterhead, no public profile, ever. This is a working relationship among professionals, not a brand.
The founding conversation.
This is being shown to a very small number of people first — the ones whose judgment determines whether it should exist at all. If the idea is right, the next step is simply a conversation among the founding principals about the 2028 board and how we coordinate on it.
What's being asked, right now
Only your read: does this make sense, and is it worth doing? No commitment, no money, nothing on paper. Just whether the people who actually do this work think it's real.
Nothing on this page is public and nothing here should be. It exists so the founding group can see the same thing at the same time — and no further than that.